This is Story Fanatic, a collection of articles covering story structure and analysis for creative writers. Published weekly.
Impact Character
The Impact Character within a complete story provides an alternative paradigm that challenges the Main Character to reexamine his or her own point-of-view. This can be, but most often isn’t, the Antagonist of a story. By the end of the story, either the Impact Character’s influence will have won out and the Main Character will alter their paradigm, or their influence will have strengthened the Main Character’s resolve and the Impact Character will alter their paradigm. Thus, this character is essential for a story to have meaning.
Screenwriters everywhere often fall into the trap of writing lines like “You and I, we’re both the same” or “I saw myself in his eyes.” This occurs because of the relationship that exists at the heart of every great story. While complete stories requires this dynamic, you don’t have to resort to clichéd dialogue.
The concept of the character arc is often thought to explain the transformation a Main Character goes through over the course of a story. The problem with this definition is the idea of “transformation”. Not every Main Character completely changes, nor do they have to. Growth can occur without losing oneself.
It’s not an easy thing adapting a short story into a workable screenplay. Frank Darabont proves as much in his latest attempt at bringing Stephen King to the silver screen.
It is not essential for the Main Character to drive the plot forward. What is essential is that we the audience share their emotional experiences. Their surprises become our surprises.
In a conversation I had with Dramatica theory creator Chris Huntley last November, I asked him, “After 10 years of writing story analysis, what are the top 10 re-occurring problems you see in story today?” He gave me two.