StoryFanatic random header image

Welcome!

It seems like maybe this is your first time here. It should be pretty obvious by the obnoxious banner overhead, but if you’re still confused what’s going on here be sure to read what this site is all about. If you like what you find here, I also encourage you to subscribe to the RSS feed. In this way, you can always stay up-to-date with this in-depth look into great stories.

Excelsior!

charlie and the corpse bride

October 2nd, 2005 · 3 Comments

Wow.

So Tim Burton was finally successful in creating a beautiful film without even a Main Character throughline. First up, the props: “Corpse Bride” is easily one of the most beautiful animated films I’ve ever seen (and I’ve seen a lot!). The new facial animation techniques create motion so smooth that at times you forget you’re watching a stop-motion film.

That is until you realize you’re watching a stop-motion story.

Ugh. There was nothing for me to grab onto - no MC throughline for which to empathize with on this amazing trip.

It’s funny too, because he could’ve just taken one of the MC throughlines from “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” and improved that film ten fold. In that film you’ve got Charlie with Willy as his IC and Willy with Christopher Lee as his IC (anything with Christopher Lee is automatically good).

So what does this mean? Both films audiences loved and could care less about the bits of story that were missing. Oh sure, I think they sense that there is something wrong - but the visuals and the imagination is so stunning that quickly discount their own intuition.

“Corpse Bride” is an anomaly for Burton as well. Usually he leaves out the Subjective Story (watch “Nightmare Before Christmas” - just as Jack and Sally are about to get together and actually share a scene, Tim quickly cuts to something else).

But it still was a beautiful film and I’ll still be the first in Best Buy on the Tuesday it comes out.

UPDATE: Chris has since posted his review for Corpse Bride. I think I was identifying more with his second storyform for the film - where there was no Main Character throughline at all. I do wish he had done the first storyform - I think it would’ve served the material better.

Share This
The Writers Store
  • Somewhat related to this article

  • Filed under: Analysis

    Tagged with:

    3 responses so far ↓

    • 1 Tristan // Jun 7, 2008 at 4:31 pm

      Tim didn’t direct Nightmare… just sayin’

    • 2 Jim // Jun 7, 2008 at 5:06 pm

      Technically that is true (Henry Selick was the director), but in this analysis I believe I was focusing more on what was missing from the story than who made the actual decision to cut from one scene to the next.

      Tim Burton’s films, while always visually amazing, always seem to be missing something to me in the final analysis. This post was one attempt to clarify that lack I was sensing.

    • 3 Tristan // Jun 9, 2008 at 11:44 am

      oh, okay. that makes sense.

    Leave a Comment

    Subscribe without commenting