StoryFanatic random header image

Welcome!

It seems like maybe this is your first time here. It should be pretty obvious by the obnoxious banner overhead, but if you’re still confused what’s going on here be sure to read what this site is all about. If you like what you find here, I also encourage you to subscribe to the RSS feed. In this way, you can always stay up-to-date with this in-depth look into great stories.

Excelsior!

building up as a backslide

June 16th, 2005 · 1 Comment

We’ve gone over building up and tearing down for Steadfast characters, and we’ve covered the tearing down of Change characters (the most typical). But what we haven’t covered yet is the building up of justifications in a Change character.

In these kinds of stories, the Main Character’s resistance to a problem is very minimal at first. The problem pops up and the MC responds, “Oh, OK, I’ll just let this one slide.” But over the course of the story the MC finds himself having to respond with greater and greater resistance, almost as if he was “backsliding.” “I’m not going to win this thing, and I’ve already backed up a little, so I guess I’ll let that one slide.” This backsliding continues until the Main Character finds himself backed into corner and with nowhere to go has to determine whether or not he is going to Change or remain Steadfast.

A perfect example of this is the Clint Eastwood western, Unforgiven. William Munny (Clint Eastwood) starts out the story in a very settled position. He knows what he is supposed to do, and more importantly what he is not supposed to do (return to his wicked ways). And instead of an active fight, he does what feels more like a backslide.

A building up Main Character still has this justification built up already within them. William Munny has a history of being a killer, but has sworn it all off in order to honor his dead wife. He has this justification but he doesn’t see it. He gets challenged more and more, and effectively his resistance to the change is what is growing (building up) - not so much the actual justification (although that is the base of it). This continues until he gets that biggest shove at the end - the sight of his best friend, Ned Logan (Morgan Freeman), on display, dead, in a pine box right there on Main Street. And then at that point he has to decide, am I going to go over the top and remain Steadfast, or swallow the bitter pill, and say, “Fine, I’ll change.” With a couple of shotgun blasts, William Munny chooses the latter.

Share This
The Writers Store
  • Somewhat related to this article

  • Filed under: Story Structure

    Tagged with: ,

    1 response so far ↓

    • 1 arijjan verboon // Jun 22, 2005 at 3:35 am

      Cool stuff Jim.

      So what ya think is the bias of the latest best picture oscarwinners related to those 4? Am I right? And how does it reflect the mood of the times? What will be next??

      Million Dollar Baby? The man who avoids inflicting pain on others? Change Build

      (As in Unforgiven??)

      Beautiful Mind? Change Tear Down

      The arrogant mathematician who needs noone is able to feel love

      Gladiator? Steadfast Build

      Revenge

      And the ones I liked:

      Eternal Sunshine Steadfast Tear Down

      Shy withdrawn grows into accepting the reality of day to day conflict and feel comfortable with it..

      Ray Change Build

      From a gifted apolitical junk to a gifted political sober role model

      Uhm next, looking at the USA and the EU from the shallow end of the pool..

      Bushes egomaniacal good ol’ boy with a crumbling empire on his hands tries to escape moral and financial bankruptcy.

      Europes utterly divided schizofrenic attempts to unify itself.

      aj

    Leave a Comment

    Subscribe without commenting